A game after he put up 24 points in a 70-69 win over Tulsa, Keith Williams leads the Cincinnati Bearcats (8-8) at home against the Tulane Green Wave (9-10) as 6-point favorites. The matchup, which begins at 4:00 PM ET on Friday, February 26, 2021, airs on ESPN+. The matchup has an over/under of 133.
Place your bet with SugarHouse online sports betting.
Bet Suggestions
Betting Information
Cincinnati vs Tulane Betting Information
Favorite |
Spread |
Favorite Spread Odds |
Underdog Spread Odds |
Total |
Over Total Odds |
Under Total Odds |
Favorite Moneyline |
Underdog Moneyline |
Cincinnati |
-6 |
-110 |
-110 |
133 |
-110 |
-110 |
-265 |
215 |
ATS Records for Cincinnati and Tulane
Cincinnati and Tulane Betting Information
|
ATS Record |
ATS Record Against 6+ Point Spread |
Over/Under Record (O-U-P) |
Cincinnati |
5-8-1 |
1-0 |
14-0 |
Tulane |
9-8 |
1-0 |
18-0 |
Cincinnati Leaders
- Williams leads the Bearcats scoring 14.8 points per game.
- David Dejulius leads Cincinnati with 4.6 assists a game and Tari Eason paces the squad with 5.3 rebounds per outing.
- Jeremiah Davenport makes a team-high 1.8 three-pointers per game for the Bearcats.
- The Bearcats steals leader is Williams, who collects 1.1 per game. Chris Vogt leads the team averaging 1.1 blocks a contest.
SugarHouse sportsbook offers new players who join today up to $250 in free bets.This bonus can be used to gamble on your favorite sports, including NFL, NBA, and NHL. It takes just a few minutes to register and access your free bet. CLICK HERE to get started.
Tulane Leaders
- Jaylen Forbes leads the team in both scoring (16.1 points per game) and rebounding (5.4 rebounds per game).
- Jordan Walker holds the title of Tulane assist leader, dishing out 4.4 assists per game this season.
- Forbes knocks down 2.4 three-pointers per game, the top mark for the Green Wave.
- The Green Wave leaders in steals and blocks are Walker (1.7 steals per game) and Kevin Cross (0.8 blocks per game).
Cincinnati vs Tulane: Last 3 Meetings
Cincinnati has won two of its last three matchups against Tulane. The Green Wave have a 2-0 record against the spread in those contests with the Bearcats.
Cincinnati vs Tulane (Last 3 Games)
Date |
Favorite |
Spread |
Total |
Favorite Moneyline |
Underdog Moneyline |
Game Type |
Result |
2/7/2021 |
Cincinnati |
-5.5 |
133.5 |
-245 |
+198 |
Regular Season |
64-61 CIN |
1/4/2020 |
Cincinnati |
-7.5 |
140.5 |
-360 |
+275 |
Regular Season |
76-71 TULANE |
1/2/2019 |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Regular Season |
93-61 CIN |
Points Insights
- The Bearcats average 67.9 points per contest, only 4.1 more points than the 63.8 the Green Wave allow their opponents.
- Cincinnati has a 7-6 record overall and a 4-0-1 record against the spread when putting up more than 63.8 points.
- Tulane has put together a 0-5 record against the spread and a 0-6 record overall in games when it allows more than 67.9 points.
- The Green Wave's 63.2 points per game are eight fewer points than the 71.2 the Bearcats allow to opponents.
- In games when it puts up more than 71.2 points, Tulane is 2-0 against the spread and 2-2 overall.
- Cincinnati is 2-8-1 against the spread and 5-8 overall when it gives up more than 63.2 points.
- The Bearcats have a negative point differential on the season (-54 total points, -3.3 per game), as do the Green Wave (-13 total points, -0.6 per game).
Rebounding Insights
- The Bearcats and the Green Wave rebound at around the same clip, with the teams averaging and 34.6 and 32.1 boards per game, respectively.
- When Cincinnati earns the rebounding advantage they are 3-3-1 against the spread. When recording fewer boards, Tulane is 5-6.
- The Bearcats grab 9.9 offensive rebounds per game, more than the Green Wave by 1.7 rebounds per game.
- The Bearcats are 4-5 against the spread when grabbing more boards than their opponents. The Green Wave are 3-5 when they trail in offensive rebounding.
- Cincinnati records an average rebounding margin of +0.6 rebounds per game, and Tulane averages a margin of -4.7 rebounds.
Place your bet with SugarHouse online sports betting.